ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL LOADS, THERMAL FLUCTUATIONS AND CHEMICAL FACTORS ON THE BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENT TO TITANIUM AND CoCrMo ALLOYS IN IMPLANT SYSTEMS – IN VITRO STUDY

Authors

  • Valentina Veselinović University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dentistry, Bulevar Vojvode Petra Bojovića 1A, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H
  • Rebeka Rudolf 2 University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova ulica 17, Maribor, Slovenia
  • Aleksandra Grebenar University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dentistry, Bulevar Vojvode Petra Bojovića 1A, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H
  • Aleksandra Čairović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rankeova 4, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Sanja Gnjato University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dentistry, Bulevar Vojvode Petra Bojovića 1A, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H
  • Nataša Trtić University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dentistry, Bulevar Vojvode Petra Bojovića 1A, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H
  • Verica Pavlić JZU Institute of Dentistry Banja Lukam, Republic of Srpska, B&H

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/COMEN1602200V

Abstract

Introduction: Cements in the oral cavity are subjected to many factors affecting cement retention, the major ones being masticatory loads and thermal stress. The gold standard in cementing restorations in the contemporary implant prosthodontics are resin cements while their predisposition to the effects of oral cavity environment presents a major factor for the efficiency of dental implant treatment.

Material and method: In the study, we used 40 test models made up of a combination of original components of the Nobel Biocare system (implant replica NobRplN and titanium suprastructure Easy abatement NP 0.75) and the restoration cast in CoCrMo alloy. The specimens were divided in 4 test groups with 10 specimens each. The specimens in each group were cemented with resin composite cement with or without using the metal primer. Group I – Multilink Implant, IvoclarVivadent, Liechtenstein, Group II – Multilink Implant, IvoclarVivadent, Liechtenstein + Monobond Plus, Group III G-CEM LinkAce®, Group IV - G-CEM LinkAce® + GC Metalprimer II. The specimens were stored in 100% relative humidity for 24 hours whereupon each group underwent 5 rounds of testing. The specimens were subjected to thermal and mechanical load cycling tests whose number reflected the period of simulation of the function in the oral cavity (unloaded specimens, 7 days of function, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months). The retention force was measured by the Universal testing machine.

Results: The highest retention values of the resin composite cement were recorded during the initial tests, which then declined in the subsequent rounds of testing. The biggest fall was measured in the first week after the cementation, while the cross-comparison of the later rounds of testing did not show any statistically significant differences. The values of the retention force of resin composite cements 12 months after the cementation dropped by one third of the initial values. All recorded values were higher in the specimens with primer coating. 

Conclusion: Masticatory forces and temperature changes in the oral cavity reduced the retention values of resin cement, but its values after 12 months of function were still high and provided stability and retention of the restoration in function. The usage of metal primer had a significant effect on retention force values at all levels of testing.  

References

M. Jurišić, D. Stamenković, A. Marković, A. Todorović, V. Leković, B. Dimitrijević, V. Konstantinovic, M. Vukadinović, Oralna implantologija, Belgrade 2008

C. M. Stanford, W. Wagner, Y. Rodriguez, R. Baena, M. Norton, E. McGlumphy, J. Schmidt, Evaluation of effectiveness of dental implant therapy in a practice- based network (FOCUS), Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, Vol. 25−2 (2010) 367−373

A. Lee, K. Okayasu, H. L. Wang, Screw-versus cement-retained implant restorations:current concepts, Implant Dent, Vol. 19−1 (2010) 8−15

J. G. Wittneben, C. Millen, U. Bragger, Clinical performance of screw versus cement retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions - a systematic review, Int J OralMaxillofac Implants, Vol. 29 (2014) 84−98

E. Sumer, Y. Deger, Contemporary per-manent luting agents used in dentistry: A literature review, Int Dent Res, Vol. 1 (2011) 26−31

P. P. Lad, M. Kamath, K. Tarale, P. B. Kusugal, Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review, I Int Oral Health, Vol. 6−1 (2014)116−120

J. P. Matinlinna, L. V. J. Lassila, P. K. Vallittu, Evaluation of five dental silanes on bonding a luting cements onto silica-coated titanium, J Dent, Vol. 34 (2006) 721–726

H. Matsumura, T.Yoneyama, S. Shimoe. Veneering technique for a Ti-6Al-7Nb framework used in a resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a highly filled indirect composite, J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 88 (2002) 636–639

H. Shimizu, K.S. Kutz, Y. Tachii, Y. Takahashi, Use of metal conditioners to improve bond strengths of autopolymerizing denture base resin to cast Ti-6Al-7Nb and Co-Cr, J Dent, Vol. 34 (2006) 117–122

Y. Tsuchimoto, Y. Yoshida, M. Takeuchi, A. Mine, H. Yatani, Y. Tagawa, et al., Effect of surface pre-treatment on durability of resin-based cements bonded to titanium, Dent Mater, Vol. 22 (2006) 545–552

P. P. Lad, M. Kamath, K. Tarale, P. B. Kusugal, Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review, I Int Oral Health, Vol. 6−1 (2014) 116-20

P. Garg, M. L. Pujari, S. Khare, Reten-tiveness of Various Luting Agents Used With Im-plant-Supported Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study, Journal of Oral Implantology, Vol. 40−6 (2014) 649−654

M. A. Alfaro, E. Papazoglou, E. A. McGlumphy, J. A. Holloway, Short–term retention properties of cements for retrievable implant-supported prostheses, Eur J ProsthodontRestor Dent, Vol. 12−1 (2004) 33−37

S. Schwarz, C. Schroder, N. Corcodel, A. J. Hassel, P. Rammelsberg, Retrospective comparison of semipermanent and permanent cementation of implant- supported single crowns and FDPs with regard to the incidence of survival and complications, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, Vol. 1 (2012) 151−158

P. Garg, G. Gupta, D. R. Prithviraj, M. Pujari, Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study, Vol. 26−1 (2013) 82−84

S. Ban, Effect of alkaline treatment of pure titanium and its alloys on the bonding strength of dental veneering resins, J Biomed Mater Res, Vol. 66 (2003) 138–145

R. G. Fonseca, J. G. Almeida, I. G. Haneda, G. L. Adabo, Effect of metal primers on bond strength of resin cements to base metals, J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 101 (2009) 262–268

M. Di Francescantonio, M. T. Oliveira, L. G. Daroz, G. E. Henriques, M. Giannini, Adhesive bonding of resin cements to cast titanium with adhesive primers, Braz DentJ, Vol. 23 (2012) 218–222

D. S. Cobb, M. A. Vargas, T. A. Fridrich, M. R. Bouschlicher, Metal surface treatment: characterization and effect on composite-to-metal bond strength, Oper Dent, Vol. 25 (2000) 427–433

M. Di Francescantonio, M. T. Oliveira, L. G. Daroz, G. E. Henriques, M. Giannini, Adhesive bonding of resin cements to cast titanium with adhesive primers, Braz DentJ, Vol. 23 (2012) 218–222

C. Ohkubo, I. Watanabe, T. Hosoi, T. Okabe, Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium frameworks using five metal primers, J Prosthet Dent., Vol. 83 (2000) 50–57

H. Shimizu, K. S. Kutz, Y. Tachii, Y.Takahashi, Use of metal conditioners to improve bond strengths of autopolymerizing denture base resin to cast Ti-6Al-7Nb and Co-Cr, J Dent., Vol. 34 (2006) 117–122

D. S. Cobb, M. A. Vargas, T. A. Fridrich, M. R. Bouschlicher, Metal surface treatment: characterization and effect on composite-to-metal bond strength, Oper Dent., Vol. 25 (2000) 427–433

M. D. Francescantonio, M. T. Oliveira, L. G. Daroz, G. E. Henriques, M. Giannini, Adhesive bonding of resin cements to cast titanium with adhesive primers, Braz Dent J., Vol. 23 (2012) 218–222

H. Koizumi, T. Ishii, K. Naito, T. Yoneyama, N. Tanoue, H. Matsumura, Effects of triazine dithione and hydrophobic phosphate monomers on bonding to Ag-Pd-Cu-Au alloy and titanium with a methacrylic resin-based luting agent, J Adhes Dent., Vol. 12 (2010) 215–222

H. Koizumi, K. Naito, T. Ishii, M. Yamashita, T. Yoneyama, H. Matsumura, Adhesi-ve bonding of Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy and component metals with acidic primers and tri-n-butylborane initiated resin, J Adhes Dent., Vol. 14 (2012) 283–292

H. Petridis, P. Garefis, H. Hirayama, N. M. Kafantaris, P. T. Koidis, Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system, Int J Prosthodont, Vol. 16 (2003) 635–639

J. E. Dudley, L. C. Richards, J. R. Abbott, Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments, Aust Dent J, Vol. 53−4 (2008) 332−339

J. Dudley, Influence of compressive cyclic loading on the retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments, doctor thesis, University of Adelaide, 2008

M. S. Gale, B. W. Darvell, Thermal cycling procedure for laboratory testing of dental restorations, J Dent, Vol. 27 (1999) 89–99

P. M. Michailesco, J. Marciano, A. R. Grieve, M. J. Abadie, An in vivo recording of variations in oral temperature during meals: a pilot study, J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 73 (1995) 214–218

S. Ergin, D. Gemalmaz, Retentive pro-perties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings, J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 88(5) (2002) 491–497

R. Schneider, M. F. De Goes, G. E. Henriques, D. C. Chan, Tensile bond strength of dual curing resin-based cements to commercially pure titanium, Dent Mater 23 (2007) 81−87

H. J. Almilhatti, K. H. Neppelenbroek, C. E. Vergani , A. L. Machado, A. C. Pavarina, E. T. Giampaolo, Adhesive bonding of resin composite to various titanium surfaces using different metal conditioners and a surface modification system, J Appl Oral Sci, Vol. 21−6 (2013) 590−6

C. Ohkubo, I. Watanabe, T. Hosoi, T. Okabe, Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium frameworks using five metal primers, J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 83 (2000) 50–57

D. S. Cobb, M. A. Vargas, T. A. Fridrich, M. R. Bouschlicher, Metal surface treatment: characterization and effect on composite-to-metal bond strength, Oper Dent, Vol. 25 (2000) 427–433

B. S. Lim, S. M. Heo, Y. K. Lee, C. W. Kim, Shear bond strength between titanium alloys and composite resin: sandblasting versus fluoride-gel treatment, J Biomed Mater Res, Vol. 64 (2003) 38–43

Y. Taira, H. Yanagida, H. Matsumura, M. Atsuta, Effects of a metal etchant and two pri-mers on resin bonding durability to titanium, Eur J Oral Sci, Vol. 112 (2004) 95−100

Y. Taira, K. Yoshida, H. Matsumura, M. Atsuta, Phosphate and thiophosphate primers for bonding prosthodontic luting materials to titanium, J Prosthet Dent, Vol. 79 (1998) 384−388

M. A. Alfaro, E. Papazoglou, E. A. McGlumphy, J. A. Holloway, Short–term retention properties of cements for retrievable implant-supported prostheses, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, Vol. 12−1 (2004) 33−37

A. Diaz-Arnold, W. V. Williams, S. Aguilino, Tensile strenghts of three luting agents for adhesion fixed partial dentures, Int J Prosthodont, Vol. 2−2 (1989) 115−122

S. Bhandari, M. Aras, V. Chitre, An in vitro evaluation of the microleakage under complete metal crowns using three adhesive luting cements, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, Vol. 12−2 (2012) 65−71

O. Kumbuloglu, L. V. Lassila, A. User, P. K. Vallittu, A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting agents, Int J Prosthodont, Vol. 17−3 (2004) 357−363

Downloads

Published

2017-12-29