Dual Witness Concept and the Murder Case of George Floyd

Abstract

This article examines the applicability and significance of the dual witness concept in the context of the George Floyd murder case. The tragic death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020 sparked global outrage and re-examination of police actions and responsibilities. At the heart of this case lies the interaction between law enforcement officers and citizens, highlighting the complexity of witness testimony and the inherent power dynamics in the criminal justice system. This study explores the concept of the dual witness – a theoretical framework that sets the simultaneous role of one person as a witness and participant in criminal incidents, but also as an expert who will give his professional findings and opinion on the disputed issues of the specific case. Furthermore, this article critically assesses the application of the dual witness concept in the trial for the murder of George Floyd, considering its implications for the prosecution, the defense and the public’s search for justice. Ultimately, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the double witness concept within the criminal justice system, offering insight into its theoretical foundations, practical implications, and potential reforms aimed at fostering transparency, accountability, and equality in police practices.