Model for expertise impairment of work ability respecting individuality, physical and psycho-physiological load of the consequences of health damage

Abstract

Expertise working for banks after the health damage (laesio valentudines violenta) require the parties to the conflict to their own interests, a court expert gives a task to this okolnost. Prosecutor insists on such a higher damage, while the respondent points out that it is obliged to compensate the injured party just as much as she curve indicating the trial judge to the need for precise task of giving expert testimony.
Especially outstanding is the problem of determining the share of the consequences of the current and previous injury the result of injuries and illnesses.
The need for differentiation of these two values ​​is common in expertise between insurance companies and pension fund. Specifically, the injured party can declare the loss of working ability, but it is controversial with insurance companies the share of injuries and possible consequence of earlier injuries and diseases, because it is a portion of material compensation between the parties. Individual factors consist of the prosecutor’s motivation, gender, age, obesity, specific work experience and any previous result of injury or disease, Annex 1.
Physical and psycho-physiological load is determined by the weight of work, Annex 2a and 2b. These two parameters are variable, the variable i is characterized by individuality in personalizovanoj considered and referred to as personal quantified disorder (PKP).
For damage to the health benefits of the Table anatomical and functional disturbance or organic system senses and represents unchanging variable.
By studying these values ​​in time to do the job and work assignments obtained precise reduction of working capacity for work that the employee previously performed.
Model contributed to unifying criteria, precise declaration and differentiation stake claims of the respondent and the respondent in everyday judicial practice.