Responsible Education of Architects – Experience From International Research Projects at the University of Belgrade – Faculty of Architecture


  • Ana Nikezić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture, Serbia,



architectural education, internationalisation, research in architecture, innovative study program


EAAE Charter on Architectural Research states that architecture is facing challenges of globalization, rapid urbanization, ecological disturbance and social transformation that necessitate permanent development in the field of education [1]. Educators, in particular, faculties and universities, need to understand and explain those changes and find a way to broaden the competencies of future generations to accept and deepen a responsible attitude towards the environment. Apart from permanent curricula improvements and innovative ways of intertwining research and teaching into a unique educational agenda, one of the essential components is also internationalization, both on the level of the study program and the level of student and staff mobility. The University of Belgrade – Faculty of Architecture is determined to strategically enhance the educational process through internationalization under the umbrella of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Green Deal and New European Bauhaus. In that way, research and education expand horizons mutually, with international experience and expertise widening our knowledge and learning to accept differences and responsibilities as educators and architects.


EAAE, “EAAE Charter on Architectural research“, 2022. Accessed: 24 May 2022. [Online]. Available:

International Union of Architects (UIA), “UNESCO/UIA Charter for Architectural Education“, 2017. Accessed: May 2022. [Online]. Available:

A. Đorđević, A. Milovanović, M. P. Milojević, A. Zorić, M. Pešić, J. Ristić Trajković, A. Nikezić, V. Djokić, „Developing Methodological Framework for Addressing Sustainability and Heritage in Architectural Higher Education—Insights from HERSUS Project“, Sustainability, 14(8), p. 4597, 2022.

UNESCO, “Issues and trends in education for sustainable development“, A. Leicht, J. Heiss and W. J. Byun (eds), UNESCO Publishing: Paris, France, 2017. Accessed: 27 May 2022. [Online]. Available:

A. Tzonis, „A framework for architectural education“, Frontiers of Architectural Research, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 477-479, December 2014.

J. Till, “Three Myths and One Model”, Building Material, Vol. 17, pp. 4-10, 2008

K. Kramer, Social Responsibility in Architectural Education, American Transactions on Engineering & Applied Sciences, Volume 1, No.3, 2012

S. Reich, J. Reich, “Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for Respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships“, Community Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 51–62, 2006

“New European Bauhaus Concept Paper“. Accessed: May 2022. [Online]. Available:

A. Cunningham, Notes on education and research around architecture. The Journal of Architecture, 10(4), pp. 415–441, 2005

Z. Xun, J. Knoblock, “The teachings of the Ru“, in A translation and study of the complete works. Stanford University Press, 1990, Vol. 2, Books 7-16, ch. 8

A. Kahn, H. Vandeveyvere, K. Allacker, “Design for the Ecological Age Rethinking the Role of Sustainability in ArchitecturalEducation“, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 175-185, 2013

D. R. Garrison, H. Kanuka, “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education“, Internet and Higher Education, 7, pp. 95–105, 2004.

European Association of Architectural Educators (EAAE), “EAAE Charter on Architectural Research“, 2014. Accessed: May 2022. [Online]. Available:

M. Burry, “Towards Meeting the challenges of facilitating Transdisciplinarity in design education, research and practise“, in Design Innovation for the Built Enviroment: Research by Design and the Renovation of Practise. Routledge, 2012, pp. 53–66.

N. Charalambous, N. Christou, “Re-adjusting the objectives of Architectural Education“, in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd International Conference on Higher Education Advances HEAd´16, June 2016, València, pp. 375–382

S. Masri, H. Arnaouty, “Architecture program accreditation: a pathway to graduates international mobility“, Athens Journal of Architecture, 1, pp. 65–81, 2015.

A. Acevedo De los Ríos, D. Rondinel Oviedo, “Impact, added value and relevance of an accreditation process on quality assurance in architectural higher education“, Quality in Higher Education, 28:2, 186-204, September 2021.

National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB), “NAAB Conditions for Accreditation“, 2020. Accessed: 24 May 2022. [Online]. Available:

Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), “RIBA Procedures for Validation and Validation Criteria for UK and international courses and examinations in architecture“, London: Royal Institute of British Architects, 2014. Accessed: 24 May 2022. [Online]. Available:

Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), “RIBA Validation Criteria at part 1 and part 2“, London: Royal Institute of British Architects, 2010. Accessed: 24 May 2022. [Online]. Available:

EuRopean Community Action Scheme for the Mobility of University Students (ERASMUS+), 2022. Accessed: 24 May 2022. [Online]. Available:

J. Russell, M. Thomson, A. Jones, “Study Architecture Well“. London: RIBA, 2021. Accessed: 24 May 2022. [Online]. Available:




How to Cite

A. Nikezić, “Responsible Education of Architects – Experience From International Research Projects at the University of Belgrade – Faculty of Architecture”, AGG+, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 030-045, Dec. 2022.