A COMPARASION OF BRACKET DEBONDING FORCES BETWEEN THE TWO ADHESIVES: CON TEC LC AND CON TEC DUO

Authors

  • Vladan Mirjanić Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H
  • Đorđe Mirjanić Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H
  • Slobodan Čupić Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, B&H

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/cm.v1i6.1965

Abstract

Fixed technique for applying brackets would be impossible without using adhesives for their fixation to the tooth enamel. However, the use of adhesives entails a number of problems which are a consequence of their imperfection, besides the fact that they have been actually applied for a number of decades already. 

The paper will analyze the debonding force values for bracket-tooth interface by using Con Tec LC and, Con Tec Duo.

For comparative analysis of the strength of bracket-tooth interface, with the application of different types of adhesives, 80 extracted teeth of the frontal region were used (maxillary and mandibular incisors and canines).

For the debonding process of applied orthodontics brackets, single-axial Stretch system for examination of tissues was applied to determine the value of the force necessary to separate the bracket from tooth surface, i.e. it was used to test debonding force. The direction of the used force for debonding was under angle of 90 degrees to the vertical axis of the tooth. 

By comparison of mean values of the strength of interface among the tested groups, it was determined that the highest average value of bond strength was with the group of teeth with which Con Tec Duo was used, a little lower mean value was recorded with the use of Con Tec LC adhesive.

References

[1] T. Graber, R. Vanarsdall, K. Vig, Current Principles and Techniques, Elsvier Mossby, St Louis, 2005.

[2] V. Mirjanić, S. Čupić, Contemporary materials in orthodontics, Eleventh Annual Conference Yucomat /Biomaterials, Herceg Novi, August 31−September 4, 2009, P. S. E. 21.

[3] W. Carstensen, Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times, Am J Orthod, Vol. 89 (1986) 70−72.

[4] W. A Wilthshire, Shear bond strength of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics, Am J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, Vol. 106 (1994) 127−30.

[5] S. Keizer, J. M. Ten Cate, J. Arends, Di-rect bonding of orthodontic brackets, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, Vol. 69 (1976) 318−27.

[6] J. I. Lopez, Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases, Am J. Orthod Dentofac Orthop, Vol. 77 (1980) 669−78.

[7] I. R. Reynolds, A review of direct ortho-dontic bonding, Br J Orthod, Vol. 2 (1985) 171−8.

[8] G. V. Newman, First direct bonding in ortodontia, Am J. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., Vol. 101 (1992) 190-192.

[9] S. Vilchis, R. Jose, Y. Seigo, K. Noriyuki, Shear bond strength of orthodontics brackets bonded with self-etching adhesives, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop., Vol. 136−3 (2009) 425−430.

[10] J. A. Foster, D. W. Berzins, T. G. Bradley, Bond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic adhesive, Angle Orthodontist, Vol. 78−2 (2008) 339−344.

[11] S. E. Bishara, D. Ortho, C. Donsombat, R. Ajlouni, J. F. Laffoon, Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer adhesive systems, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., Vol. 125 (2004) 348−350.

[12] S. E. Bishara, D. Ortho, J. F. Laffoon,
L. V. Wold, J. Warron, Effect of time on the shear bond strength of cyanoacrylate and composite orthodontic adhesives, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., Vol. 121 (2002) 297−300.

[13] S. E. Bishara, M. Salisman, J. F. Laffoon, J. Warren, Shear bond strength of a new high fluoride release glass ionomer adhesive, Angle Orthod., Vol. 78−1 (2008) 125−128.

[14] S. B. Park, W. S. Son, C. C, Ko, S. Garcia-Godoy, M. G. Park, H. Kim, Y. H. Kwon, Influence of flowable resin on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets, Dental Materials J., Vol. 28−6 (2009) 730−734.

[15] V. Mitić, M. Janošević, Influence of application time of orthophosphorous acid on the orthodontic bracket-tooth bond strength [In Serbian: Uticaj vremena aplikacije ortofosforne kiseline na jačinu veze ortodontskih bravica na zub], Serbian Dental Journal, Vol. 55 (2008) 23−33.

[16] V. Mitić, Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with GIC, Serbian Dental Journal, Vol. 56 (2009) 117−12.

[17] S. E. Bishara, M. Soliman, J. F. Laffoon, J. Warren, Shear bond strength of a new high fluoride release glass ionomer adhesive, The Angle Orthodontists, Vol. 78 (2007) 125−8.

[18] S. E. Bishara, A. W. Otsby, R. Ajlouni,
J Laffoon, J. Warren, A new premixed self-etch adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets, Angle Orthod., Vol. 78−6 (2008) 1101−1004.

[19] A. B. Lifshitz, M. Cardenas, A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive, World J Orthod., Vol. 7−2 (2006) 134−137.

[20] P. D. Lowder, T. Foley, D. W, Banting, Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries – protective resin sealant, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., Vol. 134−2 (2008) 291−295.

[21] C. G. Matasa, Do you really know the reins you use Bis GMA, Orthodontic Materials Insider, Vol. 13−1 (2000) 5−8.

[22] S. B. Pantović, G. L. Rosić, M. A. Rosić, M. Radosavljević, M. R. Kojić, J. R. Milovanović, A. P. Lučić, M. R. Radovanović, V. S. Zdravković, Advanced approach to biomechanical and functional tissue properties – new design of applied hardware and software, Medicus, Vol. 6−1 (2006) 18−20.

[23] M. Rosić, S. Pantović, V. Ranković, Z. Obradović, N. Filipović, M. Kojić, Evaluation of dynamic response and biomechanical properties of isolated blood vessels, J Biochem Methods, Vol. 70 (2008) 966−972.

[24] V. Mirjanić, S. Čupić, V. Veselinović, Con Tec LC light-curing adhesive in orthodontics, Contemporary Materials, Vol. II−1 (2011) 69−75.

Published

2015-11-11