Removal of Cr(VI) From Water Resources by Using Different Raw Inorganic Sorbents

Authors

  • Hamdije Memedi Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, State University of Tetovo, str. Ilindenn.n., 1200 Tetovo
  • Katerina Atkovska Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Rugjer Boskovic 16, Skopje
  • Kiril Lisichkov Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Rugjer Boskovic 16, Skopje
  • Mirko Marinkovski Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Rugjer Boskovic 16, Skopje
  • Stefan Kuvendziev Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius”, Rugjer Boskovic 16, Skopje
  • Zoran Bozinovski Public Enterprise, “Water Supply and Sewage”, Center for Sanitary Control, Skopje
  • Arianit A. Reka Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, State University of Tetovo, str. Ilindenn.n., 1200 Tetovo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/QOL1603077M

Abstract

Natural minerals from different localities in the Republic of Macedonia are selected for elimination of Cr(VI) ions from water resources. For that aim are selected: aksil (Kriva Palanka), trepel (Bitola), SiO2 amorphous (Kozuf), pemza (Bojanciste). In this study, their adsorption capacity is analyzed using spectrophotometric method (UV/VIS Spectrophotometer). Results from the spectrophotometric analysis in all used examples gave us insight for the starting concentration of Cr(VI) before adsorption and concentration after adsorption. The physical, chemical and mineralogical characteristics of adsorbents are studied. XRD, TGA-DTA and FT-IR analysis are used for characterization of natural mineral materials. The surface area of the sorbents were measured by BET method. With aim to determine the optimum pH value for maximal removal of Cr(VI) ions, the point of zero charge, pHPZC, for investigated materials were obtained. The aim of the study is to select which adsorbent is more efficient for elimination of Cr(VI) from water resources. According to obtained results all of them were successful in elimination of Cr(VI), but more efficient and economic is trepel.

Published

2017-01-04