Syntactic Object – Between Obligacy and Optionality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7251/fil1307013aAbstract
Starting from the theory of valence and in it established criteria and operational tests of classification and definition of complements, we apply and check these theoretical and methodological assumptions in this paper on the category of syntactic object, direct and indirect, with one main goal - to point out the flaws and problems in such an approach, and the consistency and general applicability of following categories: obligacy and optionality of complements in the process of syntactic analysis and differentiation of basic sentence and syntagmatic constituents.Downloads
Published
2013-06-30
Issue
Section
Language
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-NC license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.